Monday, 7 October 2013

To what extent should magazines be held responsible for the social ramifications of the representations they offer?




 



  With all these magazines aimed at young girls they all use bright colours to catch the eye of young readers. They all have young mast heading titles. For example 'Sugar' this could be symbolizing sweet and innocent. 'TeenVogue' and 'CosmoGirl' both imply it’s for the younger readers very clearly as the mast heading has 'Teen' or 'Girl' in. 

They all use plugs and puffs to make the cover look more appealing to the younger audience. It almost makes the cover look more cartoon like. Within the puffs it is usually a 'freebie' title, a competition or some kind of fact.

A high percentages of the main images on the magazines are young, attractive and beautiful young girls. This will appeal to the target audience of young people because this could be their role models on the front cover. The pictures are very misleading, as they have been photo shopped a substantial amount. This makes young influential children, especially girls feel depressed that they don't look as skinny, pretty or have the latest fashion statement. It has been shown that girls ranging from 6-12 have been on at least one diet as a result of trying to be like their 'beautiful but fake' role model. I think magazines should do more about body image and self-esteem to conquer this teenage issue, such as articles on these type of things. They could also do at least one magazine a year with a title such as 'natural but beautiful.' This could be dedicated to helping children build confidence, raising awareness and even include fun educational things. 

With all these magazines aimed at young girls they all use bright colours to catch the eye of young readers. They all have young mast heading titles. For example 'Sugar' this could be symbolizing sweet and innocent. 'TeenVogue' and 'CosmoGirl' both imply its for the younger readers very clearly as the mast heading has 'Teen' or 'Girl' in. 

They all use plugs and puffs to make the cover look more appealing to the younger audience. It almost makes the cover look more cartoon like. Within the puffs it is usually a 'freebie' title, a competition or some kind of fact.

A high percentage of the main images on the magazines are young, attractive and beautiful young girls. This will appeal to the target audience of young people because this could be their role model on the front cover. The pictures are very misleading, as they have been photo shopped a substantial amount. This makes young influential children, especially girls feel depressed that they don't look as skinny, pretty or have the latest fashion statement. It has been shown that girls ranging from 6-12 have been on at least one diet as a result of trying to be like their 'beautiful but fake' role model. Girls think that they have to put on tons of make up, inappropriate clothes, and fix their hair for two hours to feel beautiful just because that’s what their role models do. I think magazines should do more about body image and self-esteem to conquer this teenage issue, such as articles on these type of things. They could also do at least one magazine a year with a title such as 'natural but beautiful.' This could be dedicated to helping children build confidence, raising awareness and even include fun educational things. I believe that if the models/role models  on the front of these magazines did something about their photos being altered then this could have a massive impact. For example: Jessica Simpson has made a big thing about having 'flagrant photo shopping' on magazines and she has also recently become apart of 'Operation Smile to start A Beautiful Me.' This is a campaign to motivate teens to embrace their inner beauty. Jessica Simpson also did a make-up free photo shoot for Marie Claire, looking beautiful without help from computer enhancements or cosmetics. This would have really helped teenage girls feel better about themselves.

There is also a sexist element to teenage girl magazines. Girls are stereotypically 'meant' to be girly, boy-obsessed and into pink. But what about those girls that are different and unique? Some of the individuals are excluded from these types of magazines. I also feel that these magazines are targeted at the age group that are finding out who they are, and growing up which can be a hard time for girls. These magazines almost make out that there is a set way for a girl to act, look and dress, which i feel is the wrong message that magazines should be trying to get across. After all, would you want your child who is perfectly healthy and happy to be influenced by magazines that persuade children what the 'right way to be' is?






http://www.dosomething.org/news/5-celebrities-rejecting-hollywoods-photoshop-fever

http://womensenews.org/story/uncovering-gender/031029/teen-magazines-send-girls-all-the-wrong-messages#.UlKMCBZZERk




No comments:

Post a Comment